Iometer
Website: Iometer
To test how SSDs handle intensive and mixed workloads, we use Iometer to simulate the workloads of four real-world heavy use scenarios: database, file server, workstation and web server. The workloads are similar in that they all use fully random data at a total queue depth of 64, but differ by the sizes of the files used and the percentage split of read/write operations.
Each workload is ran and recorded for five minutes, one after the other, with thirty seconds of data before this going unrecorded so as to discard any initial speed bursts. Five minutes may not seem like much, but as you'll see it's easily enough to separate strong controllers from weaker ones with workloads this demanding. The results here are applicable only to the most demanding users - the average home user or gamer need not concern themselves.
-
OCZ Vector 150 240GB
-
Toshiba HG6 SSD 512GB
-
Crucial MX100 512GB
-
Crucial M550 512GB
-
Intel SSD 730 240GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 250GB
-
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
Average IOPS, Higher Is Better
-
OCZ Vector 150 240GB
-
Toshiba HG6 SSD 512GB
-
Crucial M550 512GB
-
Crucial MX100 512GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
-
Intel SSD 730 240GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 250GB
-
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
Average IOPS, Higher Is Better
-
OCZ Vector 150 240GB
-
Toshiba HG6 SSD 512GB
-
Crucial MX100 512GB
-
Crucial M550 512GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
-
Intel SSD 730 240GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 250GB
-
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
Average IOPS, Higher Is Better
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 500GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Evo 250GB
-
Samsung SSD 840 Pro 256GB
-
Crucial M550 512GB
-
Crucial MX100 512GB
-
OCZ Vector 150 240GB
-
Toshiba HG6 SSD 512GB
-
Intel SSD 730 240GB
-
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
Average IOPS, Higher Is Better
Want to comment? Please log in.